This video is normally available to paying customers.
You may unlock this video for FREE. Enter your email address for instant access AND to receive ongoing updates and special discounts related to this topic.
The PHA was established to provide individuals with protection against harassment and similar behaviours. Under this law, it is unlawful to engage in conduct that is considered harassment of another individual. The court has the power to issue a restraining order against any person found guilty of such actions.
It's important to note that the PHA does not offer a detailed definition of harassment. Instead, it leaves the interpretation to case-specific evaluations based on the involved circumstances. However, it explicitly declares that any action causing alarm or distress constitutes harassment.
It is crucial to note that for a harassment claim to be valid under the PHA, a 'course of conduct' must be evident. This implies that there must be at least two instances of harassment, and the individual perpetrating the harassment should be aware or should have been aware that their actions amounted to harassment. The fewer instances and the larger the time gap between them, the less likely a court will determine that a course of conduct has occurred.
Interestingly, the PHA also offers protection against collective harassment perpetrated by two or more individuals. This clause closes a potential gap in the law, where two or more people commit a single act of harassment each, providing more encompassing protection against harassment.
